The TWC summit: Is Andy Flower the right choice for England?

So England have appointed Andy Flower, not as their new coach, but as their new team director of cricket. But is there more to Flower than tough talking and a name that delights the headline-writers? Was he really the best man the ECB could find? For all the inside praise of his good work in the Caribbean, England’s batsmen have markedly failed to improve under his tuition and his close links with the previous regime raise questions of whether much has changed within Team England at all.

You can read what John Stern has to say on the appointment here, but our panel are bursting to add their tuppence below.


Edward Craig

Deputy Editor of The Wisden Cricketer

He is untried – take the West Indies tour with a pinch, not his team and unsure in his position – but he is tough, has a strong Test record as a player and England teams have responded well to a Zimbabwean in the past. I do have reservations about his lack of experience coaching, which means that I give him a very tentative thumbs up. I’d prefer to see Mickey Arthur or Tom Moody – but despite what the ECB think, beggars can’t choose …

Daniel Brigham

Assistant editor of The Wisden Cricketer

His results as England batting coach weren’t impressive – Bell and Cook didn’t improve under him. His results as interim coach weren’t impressive. Yet he is the right man for the job with a formidable character, compiled of an intelligent and open cricketing mind, a determination that comes from making yourself the number one batsman in the world while playing for a weak Zimbabwe team and, according to those who know him well, excellent man-management skills.

He also seems to have a good relationship with the captain, which, as we’ve seen, shouldn’t be taken lightly. They have had their critics for negative decisions in the Caribbean but it’s important that this England team learn how not to lose before they can start winning again. Just ask Nasser Hussain and Duncan Fletcher.


Benj Moorehead

Editorial assistant of The Wisden Cricketer

We know Flower the fine batsman. But Flower the head coach? Hmm. From what we can glean he’s an unshakable character – thick-skinned, focused, and ruthlessly workmanlike. A fierce yet controlled interview he gave to Sky after England were embarrassed in an ODI in Barbados was revealing. So, too, is his stated admiration for the Graham Gooch ethos, which Flower experienced at Essex. Gower and Flower would surely have worked well together only in rhyme.

Flower the coach is a work in progress, and as such, his appointment is high-risk. Certainly it’s not the best option for England’s immediate interests, which, in the Ashes, could not be more important. An experienced new man, untarnished by the recent dressing-room eruptions, would have been better. But who of they were available?

It’s a maybe.

Andrew McGlashan

Assistant Editor of Cricinfo.com

Before the West Indies tour even Flower wasn’t sure if he wanted to put his name forward for the top job. However, during the 11-week trip his appetite has been whetted, helped by a strong relationship with Andrew Strauss. His case was boosted as others dropped out, but it would have been a waste if the ECB had thrown away his hard work from the Caribbean by going for another candidate. Flower has the international pedigree that Peter Moores lacked and seems to know when to intervene and when to step back. Don’t forget what happened to the national team the last time a Zimbabwean was head coach.


Rob Smyth

Freelance Journalist

On results, no – losing to the West Indies was England’s worst Test series result for at least a decade – but the consistent and effusive praise afforded Flower by those inside the squad cannot be comfortably dismissed as irrelevant. There are better men available, however, not least another Zimbabwean chap with whom English cricket is quite familiar.

King Cricket

Blogger and Rob Key fan

It doesn’t really seem like a choice. Most of the leading contenders have dropped out. Graham Ford nearly didn’t apply in the first place because he thought he’d be busy watching South Africa v Australia, then he did drop out because the process was taking too long. The world’s coaches are hardly jumping at the chance to take on ‘the biggest job in cricket’.

Andy Flower seems a decent man for England to be stuck with though. There were encouraging signs in the Windies, with good responses to a couple of disasters. That said, England coaches do get the benefit of the media actively looking for good signs in the early days. That never lasts.

Flower was a great batsman largely through good organisation and a robust mental approach. Those are valuable coaching qualities too. Our only reservation is in the shape of some mediocre results with England’s batsmen who he’s been coaching for some time now.

This entry was posted in Apl 2009 and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The TWC summit: Is Andy Flower the right choice for England?

  1. The mediocre results of England batsmen might be due more to their own mental shortcomings, particularly in the case of Ian Bell, than any fault of Flower’s.

    This is borne out by the emphasis on personal responsibility since he and Strauss took over.

    I think this is probably the right decision, but once again the ECB have made a complete hash of the appointment process, eventually arriving at Flower almost by default.

  2. Peter Redding says:

    Good luck to Flower but I can’t help but think that England are paying the price for the ECB’s inability to make the right appointment two years ago. That was their chance to get a proven top-class Coach in. The World Cup had just finished and several top Coaches were available and looking for new challenges.

    There were plenty of great candidates back then, unlike now, but the ECB simply didn’t bother to talk to any of them and made a rash appointment in Moores. Ironically, this time its been the opposite because the recruitment process has taken so long that many of the candidates pulled out and Flower was pretty much the only option remaining.